Skip to content

Ottawa — The government’s bill on medical assistance in dying needs stronger safeguards before the Senate can even think about passing it, members of the Senate Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs said Tuesday.

The committee concluded its pre-study of Bill C-14 and issued a report containing a number of recommendations to strengthen the government bill, which was tabled in the House of Commons after a special joint committee of Senators and MPs studied the issue earlier this year.

“The report is an indication that Senators have some serious reservations about parts of this bill,” said Senator Bob Runciman, Chair of the Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs.

“The House of Commons would be wise to consider this before Bill C-14 is sent to the Senate. Many Senators feel very strongly about this issue, and I think that is reflected in the report.”

The committee recommended allowing people to give advanced consent to death at any time after being diagnosed with a condition likely to cause loss of competence. Members also agreed anyone benefitting from a person’s death should not generally have the ability to sign for the person requesting assistance in dying.

Additionally, members wanted to make it crystal clear that medical practitioners are free to decline to provide medical assistance in dying.

“We held marathon hearings and heard from 66 witnesses from all walks of life,” said Senator Mobina Jaffer, Deputy Chair of the committee. “I hope MPs will seriously consider our recommendations — our committee agrees the government bill as it stands now simply does not go far enough.”

The Supreme Court of Canada ruled last year that, in certain circumstances, Criminal Code provisions that prohibit medical assistance in dying violate the Charter rights of individuals. The court gave Parliament until June 6 to enact new laws.

“This is as serious an issue as we’ll ever have to deal with as legislators and we intend to do our job,” Senator Runciman said.

“It’s unfortunate the Supreme Court thinks so little of the role of Parliament that it did not grant a long enough extension to allow the kind of debate and study, in both the House of Commons and the Senate, that this topic deserves.”

Associated Links

For more information, please contact:

Mélisa Leclerc
Director of Communications
Senate of Canada
613-996-2751
melisa.leclerc@sen.parl.gc.ca

Related News

Expedited extreme intoxication law needs improvement, Senate committee says in...
Senate legal committee releases pre-study report on Bill C-7
The medical assistance in dying bill in the Senate
The Cannabis Act in the Senate

Latest Reports

Bill S-235, An Act to amend the Citizenship Act and the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, with amendment and observations The Standing Senate Committee on Social Affairs, Science and Technology
Twentieth Report

Bill C-288, An Act to amend the Telecommunications Act (transparent and accurate broadband services information), without amendment The Standing Senate Committee on Transport and Communications
Eighth Report

Bill C-226, An Act respecting the development of a national strategy to assess, prevent and address environmental racism and to advance environmental justice, without amendment The Standing Senate Committee on Energy, the Environment and Natural Resources
Seventh Report

Back to top